Feature Feedback: Would you be interested in being able to use files of full urls?

[3lpsy]

Hi, I created a fork (https://github.com/3lpsy/megurl) that ingests a file containing full urls as opposed to a hosts file + a paths file. The fork completely destroys the ability the do the hosts + paths approach but if I made a PR that maintained backwards compatibility but also added the ability to simply pass a pregenerated list of full urls, is this something you'd be interested in? I imagine it'd look like this:

meg paths hosts outputdir
meg -urls-only urls.txt outputdir

If this is not something you're interested in, no worries,

[brother0k]

Hi, I created a fork (https://github.com/3lpsy/megurl) that ingests a file containing full urls as opposed to a hosts file + a paths file. The fork completely destroys the ability the do the hosts + paths approach but if I made a PR that maintained backwards compatibility but also added the ability to simply pass a pregenerated list of full urls, is this something you'd be interested in? I imagine it'd look like this:

meg paths hosts outputdir
meg -urls-only urls.txt outputdir

If this is not something you're interested in, no worries,

easy way for full urls, just use

meg --verbose %20 urls.txt