Answer: 5 - with tanStack query 🚀

[t1m4lc]

Checklist for challenge submission

• [x] Start your PR message with Answer:${challenge_number}

Warning:

• If you want feedback or review, you must support the project on GitHub:
  • $5 per review
  • $25 for lifetime reviews

Alternatively, you can still submit your PR to join the list of answered challenges.

Oh no, that's new :( That means you'll never review all my PR now... @tomalaforge

[tomalaforge]

No I need to add a new line, for challenge creators, I will review them. But I'm bit burn out of PRs. It's taking way too much of my time and I cannot keep up. I cannot find time to create new challenges.

[tomalaforge]

Tanstack Query is 😍

[t1m4lc]

No I need to add a new line, for challenge creators, I will review them. But I'm bit burn out of PRs. It's taking way too much of my time and I cannot keep up. I cannot find time to create new challenges.

Yes I understand, do as you can. I think you have to get the community to review itself because it's not sustainable like that. I look forward to hearing from you. Maybe launch an RFC to find solutions to this?

[t1m4lc]

Tanstack Query is 😍

It's thanks to you that I discovered this. I fell in love with it the second I saw it 😁

[svenson95]

No I need to add a new line, for challenge creators, I will review them. But I'm bit burn out of PRs. It's taking way too much of my time and I cannot keep up. I cannot find time to create new challenges.

i think that solution with 5€ per review and the lifetime option is really good 👍 so that time and work you put into this project pays off, you deserve this 🚀

[t1m4lc]

i think that solution with 5€ per review and the lifetime option is really good 👍 so that time and work you put into this project pays off, you deserve this 🚀

I think that asking people to pay doesn't solve the problem here, if tomorrow thousands of pRs come in, who's going to do the reviews? I think an intra-community exchange of services is more profitable than a marginal payment. (I'm not saying that what Thomas does isn't valuable ^^, it's a matter of strategy)

[tomalaforge]

Thanks @svenson95 But the goal is not to be profitable on this project, otherwise I would have never done it this way and I would have created a paid project from the start. I'm just looking for a way to keep this project alive and still find some fun doing it. But I'm glad that @alcaidio , @svenson95 and @jdegand are helping me.

[tomalaforge]

i think that solution with 5€ per review and the lifetime option is really good 👍 so that time and work you put into this project pays off, you deserve this 🚀

I think that asking people to pay doesn't solve the problem here, if tomorrow thousands of pRs come in, who's going to do the reviews? I think an intra-community exchange of services is more profitable than a marginal payment. (I'm not saying that what Thomas does isn't valuable ^^, it's a matter of strategy)

Do you have something in mind ? I will create a thread. This PR is not suited for this conversation

[github-actions[bot]]

This pull request is stale because it has been open for 15 days with no activity.

[github-actions[bot]]

This pull request was closed because it has been inactive for 5 days since being marked as stale.