toivoh

I agree that it could be useful to have a step over command that behaves more like most debuggers. Not sure how much work it might be. I will see...

Sorry, I don't know. I haven't had the time to look into this for a long time (as you can see). But good to know that there is interest! I'll...

Indeed, it seems like a nasty interaction. As far as I can tell, the only thing that `@debug` will do with the function is to wrap it in an `esc()`...

Yes, anyone who'd like to, please feel free to dig into this! I don't think I will be able to prioritize it myself.

@mattcbro: That's a few issues in one message :) Regarding parellel execution: The instrumentation that `Debug` creates was never designed to work with code that could be sent to and...

This would indeed be a very welcome feature. I don't think that it should be so hard to add. I think that a reasonable first step would be to save...

Sorry for the delay. No, I get this too, and I'm not sure what to do about it. All I do is to readline(STDIN). I believe that @loladiro has a...

Need to figure out the steps to compile this sort of thing. With `@pattern function`, we can generate code with the method definition to evaluate the pattern and body function,...

I started to look into this, but it's a pretty perplexing error. `@debug` emits an instrumented version of code it gets, and the semantics should really be the same as...

Hi, sorry for the late reply, have been away without internet for a while. Unfortunately, there's not really any documentation besides the source itself. It's been a while since I...