Tobias Grosser

On 02/21/2013 04:02 AM, Xavier Deguillard wrote: > Ok, pyeval can easily be removed here. Will do. I tried it. It is an interesting experiment and it works already reasonably...

Here one of the errors I see: ``` Error detected while processing function ClangComplete: line 44: Traceback (most recent call last): Error detected while processing function ClangComplete: line 44: File...

This is a reworked version of #199

On 03/08/2014 04:43 AM, Xavier Deguillard wrote: > Can you add a comment on toVimRepr to state that pyeval can be used instead? As far as I remember this was...

@awlosnie: I would personally prefer to remove support for the clang binary completely. What is the reason you can not use libclang? @gribozavr: I just created a pull request (https://github.com/Rip-Rip/clang_complete/pull/213)...

On 11/19/2012 10:40 AM, awlosnie wrote: > @tobig https://github.com/tobig: Thank you for your answer. I had a > problem to configure it right in windows in gvim, so my solution...

On 23/04/2014 19:48, Nicolas Goles wrote: > Hello, > > As far as I know there's no recursive way to add all my project .h files to make `clang_complete` use...

On 23/04/2014 20:16, Nicolas Goles wrote: > Hey there, how could I make this? (sorry never used a Compilation Database before) > > I'm using clang_complete with Objective-C so I...

I am a little confused. are you using the libclang.py code completion? On which hardware? I get a about 1sec for the first and around 0.2 sec for all subsequent...

Hi Silex, I get for your example about 0.3 sec for the first run and almost no overhead for subsequent completions. Did you both compile clang yourself? Did you perhaps...