Feature: Identify object "families" using segmentation data

[freemansw1]

This is a long-promised feature to identify object families/systems by identifying where segmented objects touch.

I think this could probably use some more documentation beyond the docstring, but I wanted to get the feature in PR form first.

• [x] Have you followed our guidelines in CONTRIBUTING.md?
• [x] Have you self-reviewed your code and corrected any misspellings?
• [x] Have you written documentation that is easy to understand?
• [x] Have you written descriptive commit messages?
• [x] Have you added NumPy docstrings for newly added functions?
• [x] Have you formatted your code using black?
• [x] If you have introduced a new functionality, have you added adequate unit tests?
• [x] Have all tests passed in your local clone?
• [ ] If you have introduced a new functionality, have you added an example notebook?
• [x] Have you kept your pull request small and limited so that it is easy to review?
• [x] Have the newest changes from this branch been merged?

[github-actions[bot]]

Linting results by Pylint:

Your code has been rated at 8.72/10 (previous run: 8.72/10, +0.00) _{The linting score is an indicator that reflects how well your code version follows Pylint’s coding standards and quality metrics with respect to the RC_v1.5.x branch. A decrease usually indicates your new code does not fully meet style guidelines or has potential errors.}

[codecov[bot]]

Codecov Report

Attention: 2 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (2e4c9d0) 56.91% compared to head (95063e7) 57.18%.

Files	Patch %	Lines
tobac/utils/general.py	92.30%	2 Missing :warning:

Additional details and impacted files

@@              Coverage Diff              @@
##           RC_v1.5.x     #398      +/-   ##
=============================================
+ Coverage      56.91%   57.18%   +0.26%     
=============================================
  Files             20       20              
  Lines           3440     3466      +26     
=============================================
+ Hits            1958     1982      +24     
- Misses          1482     1484       +2     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	57.18% <92.30%> (+0.26%)	:arrow_up:

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[w-k-jones]

Naming suggestion: "cluster" for a collection of features at one time step