EfficientDet.Pytorch
EfficientDet.Pytorch copied to clipboard
The mAP of EfficientDet-D0
Hello, @toandaominh1997 , thanks for your great work. I saw your update of the EfficientDet-D0's weight and result. In the table of benchmarking, the title is
PASCAL VOC 2007 (Train/Test: 07trainval/07test, scale=600, ROI Align) The mAP is 31.6. Do you mean the EfficientDet-D0's mAP in VOC07test is 31.6? I see the other implementation's mAP is ≈80 in VOC07test. Are there some troubles or the mAP=31.6 is in COCO Dataset.
i agree with u. There is a big gap between VOC mAP 0.31 and COCO mAP 0.31
Did anybody try a COCO training? Just to know the difference between performance of this repo and the performance discussed in the paper.
My test shows it is about 0.3 mAP in Voc 2007 with EfficientDet-D2 too , I guess we need a pretrained model for EfficientDet to achieve mAP in paper.
@HannH emmmmmmm , why is just 0.3 map , did you train it enough epoch to convergence ?
@HannH emmmmmmm , why is just 0.3 map , did you train it enough epoch to convergence ?
I test it in both trainset and testset, get the following mAP: test dataset aeroplane: 0 bicycle: 0.5 bird: 0 boat: 0 bottle: 0 bus: 0.0 car: 0.8 cat: 0.5 chair: 0.0625 cow: 0.0 diningtable: 0.0 dog: 0.3333333333333333 horse: 1.0 motorbike: 0.0 person: 0.48801169590643273 pottedplant: 1.0 sheep: 0 sofa: 0.0 train: 0.8333333333333333 tvmonitor: 0 total mAP: 0.27585891812865493
train dataset aeroplane: 1.0 bicycle: 0.6666666666666666 bird: 1.0 boat: 1.0 bottle: 0 bus: 0 car: 1.0 cat: 1.0 chair: 1.0 cow: 0 diningtable: 1.0 dog: 1.0 horse: 1.0 motorbike: 0 person: 0.8421052631578947 pottedplant: 1.0 sheep: 0 sofa: 0 train: 1.0 tvmonitor: 0 total mAP: 0.6254385964912281 train_epoch=62 I dont know why there are some zero mAP objects. But it definitely gets overfitting with only EfficientNet for weight initialization.
i trained my own dataset like voc datasets, but after trained 65 epochs its map is 0.0 and no boxes to nms, have you met this problem?
@wanglaotou same thing happening with me, Retinahead is giving very low cls_score.