llms: Add fake package
PR Checklist
- [x] Read the Contributing documentation.
- [x] Read the Code of conduct documentation.
- [x] Name your Pull Request title clearly, concisely, and prefixed with the name of the primarily affected package you changed according to Good commit messages (such as
memory: add interfaces for X, Yorutil: add whizzbang helpers). - [x] Check that there isn't already a PR that solves the problem the same way to avoid creating a duplicate.
- [ ] Provide a description in this PR that addresses what the PR is solving, or reference the issue that it solves (e.g.
Fixes #123). - [ ] Describes the source of new concepts.
- [ ] References existing implementations as appropriate.
- [x] Contains test coverage for new functions.
- [x] Passes all
golangci-lintchecks.
You checked " Provide a description in this PR that addresses what the PR is solving, or reference the issue that it solves (e.g. Fixes #123).", but in fact it's not clear at all what and why this is doing.
Also, the code is full of Portuguese comments and strings, is this intentional?
You checked " Provide a description in this PR that addresses what the PR is solving, or reference the issue that it solves (e.g. Fixes #123).", but in fact it's not clear at all what and why this is doing.
Also, the code is full of Portuguese comments and strings, is this intentional?
sorry , I'll update to en and edit the list
I suggest adding a Generate interface to pass in, instead of responses []string.
Then implement a Default Generate to support it. This would allow for better customization and extensibility.