Tali Mazor

Here's an example in public portal - patient has 2 samples, one of which has no sequencing data: https://www.cbioportal.org/patient?sampleId=RP-1532_PCProject_0013_BLOOD_v1_WGS_OnPrem&studyId=mpcproject_broad_2021  I guess because the other sample has mut/CNV but not...

@alisman I guess my point was that this logic should be applied at the sample/patient level, not the study level. Just because a study has profile data doesn't mean that...

I actually think option 3 can be useful - it's a very specific question, but I can certainly imagine, for example, looking up a tumor suppressor to see how many...

I think we are still planning to do this?

@cBioPortal/product this is the ticket we talked about this morning - let's see if we can work on it soon

same issue in Downloadable Data Files / Structural Variants: STUDY_ID SAMPLE_ID TMPRSS2 ERG EGFR EWSR1 ALK BRAF ROS1 EML4 msk_impact_2017 P-0000004-T01-IM3 NA NA NA NP NA NA NA NP msk_impact_2017...

@alisman ideally the line would include those points somehow, since they are part of whatever trend is happening. what about plotting the average of the 2, with the little 2...

thanks @alisman - it looks great now

- [x] 1) I think it'd be clearer & more consistent with other profiles to call the profile 'Structural Variants' rather than 'SV Data'  https://beta.cbioportal.org/study/summary?id=lgg_tcga_pan_can_atlas_2018 NOTE: @averyniceday will handle...

did some more testing, continuing from my above comment Link for 6-9: https://beta.cbioportal.org/results/plots?cancer_study_list=laml_tcga_pub&tab_index=tab_visualize&case_set_id=laml_tcga_pub_all&Action=Submit&gene_list=RARA%250APML%250AKMT2A%250AMYH11%250ACBFB%250ARUNX1&plots_horz_selection=%7B%22dataType%22%3A%22STRUCTURAL_VARIANT%22%7D&plots_vert_selection=%7B%7D&plots_coloring_selection=%7B%22colorBySv%22%3A%22true%22%7D @ritikakundra I think if we fix the variantClass='NA' issue other items may be fixed 6. (ISSUE MADE)...