Thomas Lively
Thomas Lively
I agree that it seems inevitable that we will want near feature parity[^1] between memories and arrays. I also agree that we should think about our options to simplify that...
> cc [@tlively](https://github.com/tlively) as someone working on something that uses the `wasm` scheme. I'm happy with anything. Settling on `wasm:a/b...` for everything sounds fine. Having to add aliases for the...
Dart has some benchmarks available as well: https://github.com/mkustermann/wasm_gc_benchmarks
Nice, this looks great. I noticed an error in one of the GC tests and opened https://github.com/WebAssembly/gc/pull/549, but that doesn't need to block this landing.
The way I've been thinking about is that we would not make SpecTec a requirement in the official process docs to leave open the escape hatch of manually authoring the...
@conrad-watt, friendly ping on this :)
The formal requirements are all around test suites: 1. Test suite has been updated to cover the feature in its forked repo. 2. The test suite should run against some...
It would be good to settle the design question in #117 before phase 3 because any change we decide to make to address it would be somewhat intrusive.
The rendered spec for this instruction can be found at the spectec repo: https://wasm-dsl.github.io/spectec/core/exec/numerics.html#xref-syntax-instructions-syntax-vextternop-mathit-vextternop-mathit-sh-1-mathit-sh-2-c-1-c-2-c-3