Tamara Dahlgren

Updating the branch to see if it will resolve this odd coverage issue.

@rob64j @tom91136 Are you okay with being included as maintainers on this package?

It's been 7 days so I'm going to assume no objections to the changes.

@spackbot run pipeline

Initial attempts to add the warning to `spack fetch` and `spack stage` didn't work as the commands go straight to fetching from the cached archive then reporting the package as...

Here's another case of macOS 3.8 unit test check's code coverage data collection warnings/problems.

Hopefully a rebase to develop gets past the macOS failure that was preventing code coverage from being updated.

@alalazo Not sure if you want @becker33 to review before this is merged or not so I'll hold off.

> This (in my view!) supersedes #32611 Oops. I merged that without looking at this PR first.

@spackbot run pipeline