keras-gcn
keras-gcn copied to clipboard
GCN apply for my own dataset but training_acc is low
my data is supervised, I don‘t know whether it will influence the result, and my training_acc is 0.0911,but val_acc is alwasy 0. and trainning_loss is decresing but val_loss is incresing. I don't know how to fix it , if anyone can help me , thank you a lot.
What is the format of your data set?
my_Data.content: number_id first_x first_y second_x second_y ... fourteen_x fourteen_y label (first_x,first_y) is the coordinates of first point. X and y are all float number not 0/1. my_Data.cites: first_number_id second_number_id
And my data set is not for semi-supervised but for supervised. I don't know whether it will influence my result. Is gcn like clustering for semi-supervised ? Thanks for your answering.
Hello, gcn network is the supervised network. The input given by the author is a word. The author means that in the .content file, the word is represented as 1 in the paper, and 0 if it is not present in the paper. No float type used Looking at your own data set, you may have a problem with your data set design, and then use the author's gcn model to have low accuracy.
xie borun [email protected]
From: lzq133503 Date: 2020-03-28 13:55 To: tkipf/keras-gcn CC: xiyouxbr; Comment Subject: Re: [tkipf/keras-gcn] GCN apply for my own dataset but training_acc is low (#56) my_Data.content: number_id first_x first_y second_x second_y ... fourteen_x fourteen_y label (first_x,first_y) is the coordinates of first point. X and y are all float number not 0/1. my_Data.cites: first_number_id second_number_id And my data set is not for semi-supervised but for supervised. I don't know whether it will influence my result. Is gcn like clustering for semi-supervised ? Thanks for your answering. — You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
But my feature of a node cannot be represented by 0/1 , how can I solve this problem. If I use 0/1 to represent a node, that will be a parse matrix about 320*96 but there are 28 that value 1 and other is 0 . It may increase my calculation . ... If you have some advice, thanks very much.