tkas

> What do you mean with "the disabled button is probably the only choice."? I mean the removal from relation is safe, removal from a way can not be decided...

> Is it a theoretical bug or something encountered? I faintly remember deletion of relation members being disabled at least in some context. Encountered for second time in few days....

> Hm? Removal of some node from a relation doesn't seem safe to me. Very much depends on the type of relation and the role of the node that is...

You are able to use only OSM API calls or Overpass is available as well? ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Overpass_API/Overpass_QL#Recurse_.28n.2C_w.2C_r.2C_bn.2C_bw.2C_br.29 )

Well looks OSM API should be fine as well: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/API_v0.6#Ways_for_node:_GET_/api/0.6/node/#id/ways (next call in the docs for relations) So a check before the upload occurs should be possible, right?

O, so would you be able to either perform the check **before** you discard the relations or before the upload with OSM API? With info boards where we have global...

OK, I see. Then either we must find a way how to check before the quests are offered (to not offer this at all) or mark it in OSM data...

Another (suboptimal) option could be to use lifecycle prefixes instead of object deletion in these cases - e.g. removed: etc. ?

> To the example at hand. The deletion was wrong because after all, the element existed but at a slightly different position? Or what exactly was the new situation? It...