Takeshi KOMIYA
Takeshi KOMIYA
@shibukawa could you review this please?
Sorry, It was my mistake. I just removed `stable` branch last night... I reopened this again and change target branch to `1.7` (we decided to rename stable branch to versioned...
Yes, it looks like that.
I wonder does separated assertion really help us. At least for me, the separation does not help me. The assertion let me know only the structure of doctree was wrong....
I agree to adding good message :-) BTW, I can't understand what the assertion expects. It expects "the reference node under the non-TextElement must have only one image node". So...
To build inventory data is almost same as building HTML in processing of Sphinx. So I feel I wonder is there any worth to make the option. How about build...
As a workaround, you can do it with a simple extension. I believe it might work fine. ``` from sphinx.builders.html import StandaloneHTMLBuilder class InventoryBuilder(StandaloneHTMLBuilder): name = 'inventory' def write_doc(self, docname,...
+1: Reasonable.
The goal of this PR is to provide type narrowing to Steep. So this is not related to the "truthy" type that you mentioned. For example, the following code is...