tjmoore4
tjmoore4
Hi @ncrmro. Thank you for reaching out; I'm sorry to hear you're hitting this issue. Fundamentally, there is an inherent limit to the maximum length for certain objects due to...
@ncrmro Understood. I've added an additional issue to track this request and evaluate potential improvements. Thanks again for reaching out.
Hi @mzwettler2. At this time, the [PostgresCluster-Scoped pgAdmin](https://access.crunchydata.com/documentation/postgres-operator/latest/architecture/postgrescluster-scoped-pgadmin-4) is not compatible with PostgreSQL 15 and newer, and we are currently focusing our attention on the new [Namespace-scoped pgAdmin](https://access.crunchydata.com/documentation/postgres-operator/latest/architecture/namespace-scoped-pgadmin-4) that was...
Hello @Eric-zch. Thanks for submitting this question. One thing that would be helpful would be to see your PostgresCluster manifest as well. Regarding your particular test, do I understand correctly...
Hello @Kajot-dev, could you please provide the exact warning you are seeing in the logs, a bit more detail as to what this implementation is solving beyond PGO's current feature...
Hello @stanleyyzhu, Thank you for the detailed description of your scenario. One other thing that might be helpful would be a copy of your PostgresCluster manifest, particularly if you are...
@stanleyyzhu Thank you for providing your manifest. Two separate options might be worth exploring in more detail. Certain Postgres configuration adjustments would likely minimize the cluster's wait time. For example,...
Hello @stanleyyzhu. Sorry to hear that your adjustments so far haven't resulted in any improvement. A couple of thoughts to consider. You mentioned that public cloud solutions are not an...
@stanleyyzhu Thank you for the detailed information, this has been very helpful in understanding your scenario. We've done a bit of testing, but we haven't been able to replicate your...
Hello @nbrns. Thank you for your use-case information. I've added a note about this feature request to our backlog for future development. Regarding your specific scenario, do I understand correctly...