Timo Heister

@dsambit thanks. @kronbichler I don't think so. I assume we would need to implement new functionality.

> I think we discussed to smooth the mesh in such a way that we don't have any hanging nodes at the periodic boundaries!? Yes. I didn't get to make...

There is also step-66, which has been open for an embarrassing long time. 😢 I think it might be too late for 9.3 but I am going through the major...

It looks like we have to move the declarations of this (and some other objects) from the .cc into the header. Alternatively we can ignore the warning. Thoughts?

So I see the warning as a helper to diagnose problems in case you forget to instantiate a static member. I agree with disabling it.

Fascinating. Would this mean that we need to include the .inst files in our headers?

A bunch of tests are failing: ``` The following tests FAILED: 481 - simplex/poisson_01.mpirun=1.debug (Failed) 558 - simplex/poisson_01.mpirun=4.debug (Failed) 1073 - fullydistributed_grids/repartitioning_05.mpirun=4.debug (Failed) 1671 - multigrid-global-coarsening/multigrid_p_03.mpirun=1.debug (Failed) 1674 - multigrid-global-coarsening/multigrid_p_01.mpirun=1.debug...

@peterrum can you look at the global coarsening tests, please? ("The parallel layout of the given vector is compatible neither with the")

``` The following tests FAILED: 490 - simplex/poisson_01.mpirun=1.debug (Failed) 568 - simplex/poisson_01.mpirun=4.debug (Failed) 1152 - dofs/nodal_renumbering_01.mpirun=3.debug (Failed) 1223 - dofs/nodal_renumbering_01.mpirun=2.debug (Failed) 1261 - dofs/nodal_renumbering_01.debug (Failed) 1843 - mappings/mapping_q_eulerian_14.mpirun=1.debug (Failed) 1881...

What is the precise BDM pair that you tried?