Thomas Jay Rush

There's a branch called `issue_2203/counterparties/second` that we're working on. It's not quite ready yet, but I hope it's nearing finalization by Friday of this week. I'll let you know when...

@trev77 @unixftw We pushed some work on this to `develop` and will be releasing it to `master` later today or tomorrow. I am going to close this issue. I would...

The initial example above no longer fails to reconcile. Closing. I will open another issue for the second example, which is actually working as designed.

> Thank you for explanation. I understand now that reconciliation only makes sense on block granularity at the moment. > > Still, by looking at the code I think the...

@artur-jablonski This work has been completed and is now in `develop`. We will be pushing it to `master` later today or tomorrow.

Hi @artur-jablonski we are going to be starting this week to address this issue. It's an important one. I'll close this issue once it works as it should. Perhaps you'll...

This has been implemented in the `issue_2203/counterparties_second` branch. The fix will appear in `develop` as soon as this is merged.

Copied this issue into a TODO item in the code. When we port to GoLang, we will find it.

> At the time of running it, the index reported `35571` transactions, which is not that many (TM). It's actually a lot for a locally running application whose first principal...

This is no longer true. Closing.