shen-scheme icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
shen-scheme copied to clipboard

10000 is not a valid index for #(shen.print-prolog-vector 10000

Open lbuczkow opened this issue 2 years ago • 1 comments

I have been playing with Prolog in shen-scheme-v0.27.1-macOS. The encountered issue seems to be related to this line in make.shen:

(set *maximum-print-sequence-size* 10000)

But why does it occur? The number of solutions returned by the query is far below the limit.

Shen, www.shenlanguage.org, copyright (C) 2010-2022, Mark Tarver
version: S33.1.2, language: Scheme, platform: chez-scheme 9.5.8
port 0.27.1, ported by Bruno Deferrari


(0-) (defprolog queens
  N Queens <-- (len Queens N) (place_queens N Queens _ _);)

(defprolog place_queens 
  0 _ _ _ <-- !;
  N Cs Us [_|Ds] <-- (is M (- N 1)) (place_queens M Cs [_|Us] Ds) (place_queen N Cs Us Ds);)

(defprolog place_queen 
  N [N| _] [N| _] [N| _] <-- ;
  N [_|Cs] [_|Us] [_|Ds] <-- (place_queen N Cs Us Ds);)

(defprolog len
  [] 0 <-- ;
  [_|L] N <-- (len L M) (is N (+ 1 M));)

(prolog? (queens 8 Queens) (return Queens))

(prolog? (findall Queens (queens 8 Queens) Res))


(fn queens)

(1-) (fn place_queens)

(2-) (fn place_queen)

(3-) (fn len)

(4-) [1 7 5 8 2 4 6 3]

(5-) 
10000 is not a valid index for #(shen.print-prolog-vector 10000 (#(shen.pvar 7) . #(shen.pvar 8)) shen.-null- ((3 6 4 2 8 5 7 1) 
(3 5 2 8 6 4 7 1) (5 2 4 7 3 8 6 1) (4 2 7 3 6 8 5 1) (4 7 3 8 2 5 1 6) (6 3 7 2 8 5 1 4) (6 3 7 2 4 8 1 5) (6 4 2 8 5 7 1 3) 
(3 7 2 8 6 4 1 5) (5 2 4 6 8 3 1 7) (4 2 7 3 6 8 1 5) (2 7 3 6 8 5 1 4) (5 3 8 4 7 1 6 2) (4 6 8 2 7 1 3 5) (4 7 5 2 6 1 3 8) 
(7 3 8 2 5 1 6 4) (3 6 8 2 4 1 7 5) (5 7 2 4 8 1 3 6) (7 4 2 8 6 1 3 5) (7 4 2 5 8 1 3 6) (5 7 2 6 3 1 8 4) (5 7 2 6 3 1 4 8) 
(3 6 2 7 5 1 8 4) (3 6 2 5 8 1 7 4) (3 7 2 8 5 1 4 6) (4 2 8 5 7 1 3 6) (4 2 5 8 6 1 3 7) (2 4 6 8 3 1 7 5) (4 6 8 3 1 7 5 2) 
(4 7 5 3 1 6 8 2) (4 8 5 3 1 7 2 6) (6 3 5 8 1 4 2 7) (6 3 5 7 1 4 2 8) (6 3 7 4 1 8 2 5) (3 5 8 4 1 7 2 6) (3 8 4 7 1 6 2 5) 
(6 8 2 4 1 7 5 3) (3 5 2 8 1 7 4 6) (3 6 2 7 1 4 8 5) (4 2 7 5 1 8 6 3) (4 2 8 6 1 3 5 7) (8 2 5 3 1 7 4 6) (7 2 6 3 1 4 8 5)
 (2 7 5 8 1 4 6 3) (2 5 7 4 1 8 6 3) (2 6 8 3 1 4 7 5) (5 7 4 1 3 8 6 2) (3 6 8 1 4 7 5 2) (3 6 4 1 8 5 7 2) (5 8 4 1 3 6 2 7)
 (6 4 7 1 3 5 2 8) (7 5 3 1 6 8 2 4) (3 6 8 1 5 7 2 4) (5 8 4 1 7 2 6 3) (6 4 7 1 8 2 5 3) (3 5 7 1 4 2 8 6) (5 2 6 1 7 4 8 3) 
(6 2 7 1 4 8 5 3) (5 2 8 1 4 7 3 6) (8 2 4 1 7 5 3 6) (7 2 4 1 8 5 3 6) (6 2 7 1 3 5 8 4) (2 8 6 1 3 5 7 4) (2 5 7 1 3 8 6 4)
 (5 7 1 3 8 6 4 2) (7 3 1 6 8 5 2 4) (6 3 1 7 5 8 2 4) (6 4 1 5 8 2 7 3) (4 7 1 8 5 2 6 3) (4 8 1 5 7 2 6 3) (8 4 1 3 6 2 7 5) 
(4 8 1 3 6 2 7 5) (6 3 1 8 5 2 4 7) (5 3 1 6 8 2 4 7) (6 3 1 8 4 2 7 5) (5 7 1 4 2 8 6 3) (4 6 1 5 2 8 3 7) (8 3 1 6 2 5 7 4) 
(5 3 1 7 2 8 6 4) (2 6 1 7 4 8 3 5) (4 1 5 8 6 3 7 2) (5 1 8 6 3 7 2 4) (7 1 3 8 6 4 2 5) (5 1 4 6 8 2 7 3) (3 1 7 5 8 2 4 6) 
(5 1 8 4 2 7 3 6) (4 1 5 8 2 7 3 6) (6 1 5 2 8 3 7 4) (1 5 8 6 3 7 2 4) (1 6 8 3 7 4 2 5) (1 7 4 6 8 2 5 3) (1 7 5 8 2 4 6 3)) 
shen.-null- shen.-null- shen.-null- (#(shen.pvar 10) . #(shen.pvar 11)) shen.-null- shen.-null- (#(shen.pvar 13) . 
#(shen.pvar 14)) shen.-null- shen.-null- (#(shen.pvar 16) . #(shen.pvar 17)) shen.-null- shen.-null- (#(shen.pvar 19) . 
#(shen.pvar 20)) shen.-null- shen.-null- (#(shen.pvar 22) . #(shen.pvar 23)) shen.-null- shen.-null- (#(shen.pvar 25) . 
#(shen.pvar 26)) shen.-null- shen.-null- (#(shen.pvar 28) . #(shen.pvar 29)) shen.-null- shen.-null- (#(shen.pvar 31) . 
#(shen.pvar 32)) shen.-null- shen.-null- (#(shen.pvar 34) 
...  
#(shen.pvar 9995)) shen.-null- shen.-null- (#(shen.pvar 9997) . #(shen.pvar 9998)) 
shen.-null- shen.-null- shen.-null- shen.-null-) 

lbuczkow avatar Nov 11 '22 17:11 lbuczkow

@lbuczkow hello! The issue is that you are running out of space in the prolog vector (initialized here). You can increase the size by calling the prolog-memory function: (prolog-memory 1e5)

But even when I do that, I get the same failure when running your code (it just takes longer, and it fails when trying to access index 100000), so it seems the code never terminates?

tizoc avatar Nov 13 '22 00:11 tizoc