Titus Fortner

Also, conceptually, is this a bug, or effectively a feature request to support another type of output?

> In .NET Core and .NET5+ App.config files and binding redirects are a thing of the past! Yes, but so long as Selenium supports .NET Framework, it will continue to...

Can you join us in Slack to discuss? https://www.selenium.dev/support/#ChatRoom

I updated the ticket with which of the Ruby errors I've verified are also broken in Java. @asolntsev verified interoperability in Java between the versions based on a single test,...

Ok, just overhauled the original post with all the data. I think option 1 or 3 are reasonable, but 2 is way more effort than we have resources available right...

The primary (and legitimate) use case is going to be Selenium 2 users who want to run tests on the latest Firefox or Safari browsers, which are w3c only. Theoretically...

And I made an updated update. Fun story. I was noting some weird differences between Ruby 2.53 and Java 2.53 with Grid 4. Turns out that before we created the...

Also interesting to look at selenium-java numbers from the past month: W3C users: Selenium 4+ — 10% Selenium 4 pre-release — 7% (I don't know why, either) Selenium 3.9 -...

To be fair, I'm not sure we should be supporting curl requests directly? If they'd sent the request to the Grid for `window/current/size` it would have converted it to what...

So, we've agreed to only support w3c compliant capabilities starting in Selenium 4.3. As part of figuring out how to throw good warning messages for Selenium 4.2, I came across...