<editor> is a too general name for a selector

[swirlsky]

Have you considered giving a more specific name for the selector used in the template? <tinymce... or something similar would be more appropriate I think.

[tinydylan]

This sounds like a reasonable enhancement. The only concern is backwards compatibility, so it'd need to be in a major version bump.

[danoaky-tiny]

Since this is such an old ticket I'm going to close this as not planned for now. If anybody is still interested in this, feel free to open a new issue.

Otherwise in my opinion, most of the other integrations also have their default selector or export name as Editor/editor. So as it is right now it keeps consistency. As well as this, you would almost certainly be wrapping our component in your own, with its own name/selector that you can choose.