Tim Robertson

The idea of determining if there is a changeset seems sensible to consider, although in 10yrs of operating it's only been raised once that I can see. Are there others...

> Under the hood we convert that to the [EML](https://eml.ecoinformatics.org/schema/) format, and it does not support more than one project I'm really not an XSD expert but I think the...

@SophiePamerlon - is it really just multiple funders that you want, please? Can you point us to an example of what they are doing now?

Thanks @ymgan Yes, we would very much like to explore what can be done. The IPT will call the GBIF validator service. We're just finishing up some cleanup of that,...

The corresponding GBIF registry issue is https://github.com/gbif/registry/issues/4

> Note that this change would affect processing of data by GBIF, OBIS and any downstream use. This won't affect GBIF processing per se, as GBIF.org (and ALA) would already...

Thanks, @mjy One idea could be GBIF offers this kind of JS widget that provides a view of the record that was published, and the enrichments we apply. You may...

Assuming that recommendation does go through in the next edition of DwC: > Will the IPT continue to require basisOfRecord? Yes, I would expect as the reason it was first...

Thanks for confirming that Abby. That seems like a nuisance, and something perhaps we should just fix for any vocabulary field on import (ignore whitespace, casing and `_`). Agree?

Thanks @peterdesmet - yes, I think applying only to those controlled fields the IPT requires makes sense. Basically, it's to stop the IPT failing the publication just because you wrote...