Tim

@eroldan So let me see if I'm understanding you here. What you want is: 1. Remote container filesystem reflects changes on the local filesystem, both adds and deletes 2. Local...

Wouldn't it make sense for the remote to only roll on changes _pushed_ from the local? I'm not sure which is harder though, making the restart sequence aware of where...

I agree with you generally, although I'm not sure why you would want updating files in the container manually to roll the container itself. In that circumstance you don't need...

@jmlambert78 Like #161 we don't support `btrfs` as an overlay. If I remember correctly, it's because we can't get the unioned fs locations for a given volume mount. It has...

@ankitm123 Go for it! I mostly added this as a note for myself, but happy to have the help!

> - Is this already taken care of by kubectl proxy for us? Short answer, no.

All of the documents should™ be here. There are a few write-ups floating around in blogs, but that's it.

*Sigh*

It sounds like the original suggestion might still be helpful in other situations. I wonder how much work it would take to do.

Is the `syncthing` process running and listening on port `8384`?