timelyportfolio

possibly something here https://github.com/rstudio/crosstalk/commit/689fa97f0f772775e4628b0ce1af23fa36bc81bf. The `css` does not appear to be encapsulated, so could be affecting entire page.

I just found your example from the other issue. Inspecting `bootstrap` a little more closely, we can see  so the "downgraded" bootstrap 3.3.2 is present. Where can I find...

ok, then I thought it was a bootstrap version issue, but this appears to just be a bootstrap existence issue. See if this helps. ``` library(crosstalk) library(htmltools) sd

I forgot that `rmarkdown` checks for valid path, and `suppressDependencies` works by changing the path to `NULL`, which of course is not valid. Can you try option #2? If it...

It seems like a set of non-Bootstrap controls would be a welcome addition to the R `crosstalk` family.

@jcheng5 can confirm, but it looks you are correct based on [lines](https://github.com/rstudio/crosstalk/blob/master/R/crosstalk.R#L229-L239) and [lines](https://github.com/rstudio/crosstalk/blob/master/R/crosstalk.R#L276-L289)

Without knowledge of the `SharedData` in R, it is very difficult to know to which group an `htmlwidget` or other component belongs. In most cases, we could derive this from...

any thoughts on this? I keep getting blocked by this unfortunately. Happy to try a pull request.

Perhaps,this registry/gallery for biojs http://biojs.io/ will give us some ideas. @hafen, I believe it automatically pulls in forks/stars from Github.

Also, I think it would be nice to use some of the htmlwidgets to draw networks of htmlwidgets using meta-information such as JavaScript dependencies, co-authorship, tags that @hafen has included....