Tim Cappalli

That seems... messy to be honest. What were the concerns with the method taking an input parameter with a protocol name?

[2024-11-18 call](https://github.com/WICG/digital-credentials/wiki/2024-11-18-Meeting-Notes#issue-add-a-way-to-check-what-protocols-are-supported-168): this wouldn't actually provide a lot of value if some clients will just always return true. A separate issue will be opened for client capabilities (such as cross-device...

@marcoscaceres can we close this since #221 landed?

@sshmaxime I don't think there's anything in the linked section that specifies this behavior. Is this question more about a specific implementation in a user agent(s)?

I've been thinking about issuance in the Web Platform API as very similar to a presentation (pass the OID4VCI request to the app platform), except that there isn't really a...

~@samuelgoto what's the reasoning for `.store`? The ultimate result is the creation of a digital credential in an external container. I think it should be `.create`, similar to WebAuthn.~

Sorry, looks like I saw an earlier version before it was edited.

> Question: is there an equivalent of a "un-issuance"? Can a wallet create and then invalidate / delete it? Not typically via the front channel. WebAuthn will soon have some...

> Is this intended to only reveal information on what the browser version supports passing through and specifically not to reveal any details of what wallets are available, what the...

> Browsers could modify the response based on some knowledge of wallet availability or configuration Not sure I follow. The browser is the only party handling this request and response.