Tim Cappalli
Tim Cappalli
I'd prefer option 3. Device management status and device compliance are very different signals. Device management status is often one piece of context that is used to determine device compliance.
From 2024-05-28 in person discussion: - Sentiment is generally positive for this - @timcappalli to add a RISC example to this issue - Need to define a new spec (ex:...
Bump @independentid
on 2023-03-21: needs more discussion on next call with larger audience
@andrei-galkin which RFC are you referring to? SSF and SSF events are defined in OpenID specifications which are profiles of various IETF RFCs. If you're looking for a way to...
on 2023-03-21: defer for later discussion, old topic but may still be revelant
I'm a bit surprised to see the call out to FCM for directed identifiers, as I was under the impression that directed identifiers were not in scope for that work...
We discussed this on a WG call a few weeks back, and I think there was loose agreement to do this as part of Level 4 (e.g. replacement added in...
> @timcappalli Are you thinking about auth here? Because client-device and hybrid hints should solve this for registration... I updated my comment. We talked about adding something equivalent to `cross-device`...
Simplicity for developers and future proofing. The other thing we need to think about is the difference between authenticatorAttachment today vs hints. Hints are just a hint. It is expected...