Tim Shea
Tim Shea
@PhilippPlank Is this still an issue?
> I may be misunderstanding this. At least for output from a network, this seems to be overlapping with the `Monitor` Process. Would it make sense to add any output-related...
> I am somewhat confused by the API. It would expose Lava `Vars` to the application scope, independent of the Process that it was generated from. This may break up...
This does seem like a very powerful feature, but it also makes debugging and even understanding the generated process graphs significantly more complicated. I would love to see this infrastructure...
> I am not sure if I like this change. Calling just `.run()` does not tell what is going to happen. Also `.run(10)` or `.run(condition=10)`. I agree that `proc.run(10)` is...
This isn't necessary. It was just a nice to have.
> I fixed all issues within this repository but the underlying approach seems to not support pulling additional imports in the `lava` modules of other repositories (e.g., lava-loihi). This point...
@mathisrichter What is the current status of this issue?
@bamsumit @PhilippPlank
@weidel-p Is this issue still relevant?