tim-salabim
tim-salabim
In case we could wrap that in a function, say `playback`, that takes a `sf` object, checks for `recorder` attribute and if present returns such an animation, I think that...
For now I guess the attribute approach is good, as it still preserves the `sf` class. If we later on find that this is something that people really use very...
Is this approach CRAN conform?
Sweet, then I think this is a good approach. A suitable warning that for this particular piece `geojsonio` is needed should suffice.
Yes, I guess web-mercator makes sense as things will look similar to what's been edited on the map.
I think for now (i.e. useR!) it would be enough to highlight that we have something in the pipeline in this direction and show a first (even alpha-state) implementation. Hopefully...
For both playback functions I only see the stuff draw in the first instance but there is no animation of any subsequent edits (i.e. moving vertices around)
I see! Confirmed, it works in the breowser. Thanks, this is awsome!
could this also work for `editFeatures`?
No objections! It is definitely desirable to have the map background. Ideally, as in `editMap`, a user-defined map.