Till Tietz

Is there still a desire to make this a feature? We also run into trouble creating `parameters_df` for this type of model; see: ``` m

What version are you on? Can't reproduce this on the 1.0.1 Linux binaries either.

This is very strange. Looks like we'll have to check the mac OS binary builds since this issue doesn't seem to reproduce on 1.0.1 for windows + Linux

@cristian-nicolescu any update on the version that produces the bug? There have been recent updates to `parmap` that are now on main. Would be curious if those resolve the issue

@gerasy1987 @macartan @lilymedina do we want to divide commenting on these up amongst ourselves? Skimming over the requirements it doesn't look like we'll have to make major changes to CQ...

@lilymedina @macartan @gerasy1987 are we still pursuing this prior to submitting to JSS?

@macartan I'll divide up the list. Should be a quick one to knock out I think.

@macartan do you want to tackle the **B** issues? I'll tackle the **G** issues. My sense is that answers to these should be extremely brief. From looking over this CQ...

They want comments + answers in a file named `srr-stats-standards.r` that should be included in the package

kind of weird that they don't want a .md file (will check if it has to be a .R file)