Michał Pierzchała
Michał Pierzchała
Thanks @atlj! Please contact Nico on how this can be ported to the RNGP in core repo
Could you setup a repro so it's easier to approach this case?
Agree with @SimenB. I don't see a value in processing coverage for a failed test and related files (if not processed by other code). By doing so, we could also...
Please provide a repro somebody can download and triage.
It's optional, that's why I'm not closing this issue :) (however I could do it, because you removed quite some important information, like which version of Jest you use, which...
@SimenB haven't thought about that either. Would be quite a breaking change with Lolex.
Can confirm this is a bug. cc @pedrottimark @mattphillips
If this is what we expect and makes sense in general, it should be documented, because it's definitely not obvious. I think we could do better though
Since v25 is nearing, I'd stick it there, it's easier to justify breaking behavior (even though fixing bugs) in a major change.