Tomas Hurka
Tomas Hurka
I don't think the problem is caused by JDK version. Can you please provide steps how do you get "Not supported for this JVM". Can you attach VisualVM log file?
Can you provide more details, what should be done? What does "putting zip content online" mean?
Thanks for info.
This bug can be reproduce only if the memory is monitored via jvmstat (typically for local process). Monitoring via JMX (typically remote process) works fine.
Ok, this could be implemented in a similar way heap viewer has 'Hide Classes With No Instances'. data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b8de6/b8de65fd71d6c8c20cdce57d86ab235e91de08b9" alt="no_instances"
Below is the screenshot from the prototype. Is this what you requested? data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ff498/ff498d12e21912be65a66a6ca096b6fa546facfe" alt="self"
Done in master.
Is there a way to reproduce it, somehow?
`CompositeDataSupport` and `ObjectOutputStream` are used by JMX monitoring. This is used for example for CPU load and Thread state monitoring. JMX is not used for profiling.
This hard to tell without actual code of `com.examle.ApApplication` class, but I guess that no `com.examle.ApApplication` code is running after you started profiling. Can you provide steps to reproduce?