Thorsten Hater

Yes, but to get a properly set up object, they still need to call `__init__`

Yeah, that has been my opinion as well for some time. Question @brenthuisman: How do you define 'complete'? ```py class R(arb.recipe): pass ``` is complete, although not helpful. ```py class...

Ok, then define 'required overloads' Edit: Yes, the added Definition works. That's a very minimal set we can potentially check in the `simulation_shim`'s metaclass `__instancecheck__`.

Update: metaclasses and pybind11 are not friends. At all. So, there two known issues in pybind 1. Abstract classes will not be abstract after wrapping. 2. We cannot set up...

Hi @schmitts, do you have an idea whether this is a bug, a missing feature, and how others in the field handle this? Where would an insulator need to be...

Hi @schmitts, any news here? Just a thought: Wouldn't an insulator imply your are actually looking at two cells? Or at least a different morphology, where the insulating segment is...

Hi @schmitts, I agree this should not crash, however, what are the expected semantics in this case? Like `C`, ie ``` A = B > 0 ``` is equivalent to...

Hi @schmitts, could you try this ``` NEURON { POINT_PROCESS graupner_brunel } INITIAL { c = 0 rho = 0 theta_p = 0 } STATE { c rho theta_p }...

@schmitts 👋

But could you verify that the workaround above does what you need? And that it does not crash of course.