Thomas Thomassen
Thomas Thomassen
If the parameters where added to the definition then I think one could use Make Component and keep it as a group. Moving to the definition would mean code that...
We're QA testing the v2.0.0 version - I'm holding this pull until it's been tested and verified we don't need to fix anything.
HM.. John - did you end up publishing your own version?
+1 I would also like a way to pick the size via a tool - but this would require a huge refactoring.
I'm not clear where this is. Got a line number or screenshot?
Changing it so you define things based on 360 degrees is fine by me, as long as it doesn't break existing models.
Hi, which contact part of the developer site is giving 404? Can you post the link that give 404 and where that's linked from? For API usage questions the forums...
Ah, right. Yes, the tests are not located in the extension folder. The RBZ was generated quickly as a side-thought. We somewhat assumed people would clone the GitHub repo and...
> Ruby 3.1 will build with VS 2022, but it fails some numeric tests. It does build with VS 2019. The bug in 2022 is fixed, but hasn't been released....
So it appear that it's been UCRT for a while, since Visual Studio 2015. The file naming has been wrong for a good while. We made a note of that,...