Migrating from Fluentassertions, is there a good way to rewrite property chaining?

[ChristianSauer]

I.e. something like this:

        result
            .Should()
            .BeOfType<EventHandled>()
            .Subject.ConsecutiveEvents[0]
            .Should()
            .Be(@event.Source);

I can replicate the first part easy enough

  await Assert.That(result).IsTypeOf<EventHandled>

But how to access the ConsecutiveEvents?

[thomhurst]

I need to expand the chaining functionality for properties etc.

It doesn't exist right now, and would require another Assertion line where you manually pass the property into a new Assert.That() call.

The syntax that I'll probably build though would most likely look like:

Assert.That(obj)
.IsTypeOf<Something>()
.And
.Item(x => x.ConsecutiveEvents[0])
.IsEqualTo("Foo");

[ChristianSauer]

Thanks, that looks sensible

[github-actions[bot]]

This issue is stale because it has been open 30 days with no activity. Remove stale label or comment or this will be closed in 5 days.

[github-actions[bot]]

This issue is stale because it has been open 30 days with no activity. Remove stale label or comment or this will be closed in 5 days.

[github-actions[bot]]

This issue was closed because it has been stalled for 5 days with no activity.