Diego Pedregal

Results 18 comments of Diego Pedregal

Another interesting feature would be to add `@Documented` in both `@Builder` and `@BuilderInterfaces`. At least I'd find it useful in the case of meta-annotations. Anyway, this is a minor update...

It would make `@Builder` and/or `@BuilderInterfaces` annotations to appear in JavaDocs in its annotated elements. I think it would be really useful if Jilt's annotations are used as meta-annotations. This...

A thought just popped in right before going to bed: it might have to do with the retention policy. I will test tomorrow if possible

Follow up: I tested it and obviously with `RetentionPolicy.SOURCE` annotations are lost after compiling the common project, so no processing takes place on dependent projects. I also tested it with...

You are right! I edited the comment to make sense. It was a typo

To be honest I'd rather redo my custom annotation per project. I see your proposal more like a tweaking. It seems there is no other way at the moment, tho....

Maybe coding a processor for the custom annotation in the shared library would work. Although it is also a bit of work, maybe simply extending or copying Jilt's would be...

Hi @skinny85. First of all, thanks for releasing the new version! But I'm afraid this problem is not solved... Meta-annotations still fails to work when using a common library for...