Arne Blankerts
Arne Blankerts
> > I imagine that this may require an new option (toggle) in the phive.xml file to optionally turn this on if the PHAR was created via GH Actions with...
> > > But Phive, on the end user's device, needs to verify things at runtime. Otherwise it'd be kind of pointless, or? > > Correct, but only for those...
Is there some actual documentation on how this stuff is supposed to work other than "install this cli tool"?
Thanks for the pointers, but those aren't exactly what I was looking for. If I am to implement support for this, I'd need to understand what I - at a...
As this will lead to a BC break - returning a Collection of Licenses rather than a single license - we cannot add this into `2.x`.
Not yet. I have a work in progress implementation for the multi licenses definitions but I want to add additional things for a 3.0 release. Sorry for the delay.
It's actually very much intentional we drop the extension. And one of the reaons is exactly that PHPStorm does *NOT* "see" them. Because you exactly do NOT want to have...
I'm still not fully convinced but am considering to add this, as you made it a configurable thing. Did you test this on windows? Because adding `.phar` to a `.bat`...
Second question: Is the `-e`-Handling reflected in the data stored in the `phive.xml` / `.phive/phars.xml` respectively?
On a unix'ish OS, we use symlinks per default to map a shared phar from the location we store them into the respective project. We can, of course, easily control...