James Campbell
James Campbell
Should we punish nodes that fall on the wrong side of the vote? should we reward the nodes that fall on the correct side of the vote? A simple implementation...
the "negative proof" problem is tricky. instead, what if each node submitted evidence that it IS online, rather than snitching on each other?? 1. Initiation of Submission Period The L2...
> My concern here is that the evidence collected through interactions doesn't look like a pretty good sampling method to me. What happens with the less active nodes (those that...
> For every N-th block, check its blockhash H_i. If H_i mod M < T, then a new submission period just started; otherwise, simply ignore. This is a cool idea...
Basic idea of how the smart contract would look is now here https://github.com/nucypher/nucypher-contracts/pull/248
@cygnusv I spoke with @piotr-roslaniec and he suggested looking into BN254 which has support for aggregated signatures and has precompiles available on EVMs. Some info here https://hackmd.io/@liangcc/bls-solidity In particular, BN254...
Love this, It's a great first go at fees. I think we need to make a clear separation between Network Fees (paid in T, provide rewards for our nodes) and...
Some comments after our discussion: - Initiating a ritual is expensive due to the requirement that Transcripts are publicly available to all nodes in a Cohort. This can be in...
I am very much in favour of versioning the language as a whole, not each individual condition
+1 on this, I'm experiencing the same. Seems like the build process isn't doing what's expected