therecipe

@mixedCase Thank you very much :) >I'm not sure if this kind of exchange is legally valid under any jurisdiction Yeah, I know. But I think/hope an [oral contract](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oral_contract) is...

@5k3105 @m8m5 @hvnsweeting @nnvn @joesis @pekim @jordanorelli @aebruno Thank you all, I really appreciate it :)

@bclermont >which license you think of? Something like BSD? I honestly didn't planned that far ahead yet, but I think it will be bases on (or maybe even be identical...

@akamensky Thank you, and also for the explanation :) >The above procedure does not require transfer of the rights. Also in situation of changing licensing model or adding extra license...

@m8m5 Thank you, these look great :) I will add one of them.

@joeblew99 >What is the intent ? >Are you going to make this repo have a supported commercial side that you charge for ? Not directly, in the first place it's...

@joeblew99 >Can you be more specific. I will make things more specific, as soon as I looked into them deeper. For now I just wanted to get the general consent...

@bclermont @m8m5 @jordanorelli @akamensky @5k3105 @longlongh4 @aebruno @nnvn @hvnsweeting @KellyLSB @pekim @joesis @mixedCase @xland Hey, it's me again. I did setup a formal CLA as akamensky suggested. And it would...

@mixedCase > So, there's one thing I'm not so clear about... The bindings themselves (both the Go and C++ code) are under the LGPL. While qtdeploy might dynamically link against...

>Unfortunately this is not the case, the way Qt allows it is via dynamic linking to the LGPL version or the commercial license. Or you could statically link and also...