themix-gui icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
themix-gui copied to clipboard

Changing project structure, packaging, naming

Open actionless opened this issue 6 years ago • 33 comments

Regarding name (https://github.com/actionless/oomox/issues/116) so far I am thinking of themix so it will be used in the examples below.

Packages: themix-full (metapackage, depends on rest of the packages, replaces oomox package) themix-gui themix-theme-oomox themix-theme-materia themix-icons-gnome-colors themix-icons-archdroid themix-export-spotify themix-import-base16 themix-import-image

Executable names: themix themix-cli-oomox themix-cli-materia and so on or mb more explicit like themix-cli-theme-materia And for compatibility: oomox-gui -> themix oomox-cli -> themix-cli-oomox and so on

I was thinking about having single themix-cli entrypoint and things like themix-cli --theme oomox and themix-cli --theme materia but anyway we need to have single cli executables for each theme plugin, to make them able to work independently without main gui app installed. -- extracted into https://github.com/themix-project/oomox/issues/202

Also I am considering moving project to a dedicated github project to encourage more community participation since it won't look that much like a personal project.

To be done:

  • [x] finalize the decision on name :smiley:

  • [x] move repos to the new organization

  • [x] ./packaging/install_plugin.sh makefile targets for installing plugins

  • [x] writing new PKGBUILDs

  • [x] updating deb packaging and Dockerfile of deb-builder

  • [ ] renaming Oomox->Themix in low-hanging-fruit cases (more complicated cases would go into separate tickets)

actionless avatar Mar 14 '18 02:03 actionless

I always plan to package Oomox into Debian repository. After lot of change of structure I have decided to wait a little bit to finalize this work. Do you think this change could be the last big one for the next year?

I also agree with you, it could be great to have a community repository.

Best regards and thanks for your great job, Alex.

Le 14/03/2018 à 03:45, Yauhen Kirylau a écrit :

Regarding name (#116 https://github.com/actionless/oomox/issues/116) so far I am thinking of |themix| so it will be used in the examples below.

Packages: |themix-full| (metapackage, depends on rest of the packages, replaces |oomox| package) |themix-gui| |themix-theme-oomox| |themix-theme-materia| |themix-icons-gnome-colors| |themix-icons-archdroid| |themix-export-spotify| |themix-format-base16|

Executable names: |themix| |themix-cli| — not implemented yet And for compatibility: |oomox-gui| -> |themix| |oomox-cli| -> |themix-cli-oomox| and so on

I was thinking about having single |themix-cli| entrypoint and things like |themix-cli --theme oomox| and |themix-cli --theme materia| but anyway we need to have single cli executables for each theme plugin, to make them able to work independently without main gui app installed.

Also I am considering moving project to a dedicated github project to encourage more community participation since it won't look that much like a personal project.

To be done:

|./packaging/install_plugin.sh|
writing new PKGBUILDs

— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/actionless/oomox/issues/129, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AD_1DJ6MByOdnSayJvIIR3_A3_L4KShvks5teIRJgaJpZM4SpwQk.

alexarnaud avatar Mar 14 '18 21:03 alexarnaud

repository structure won't be affected, only packaging scripts, so if you are writing your own packaging scripts this change shouldn't affect you in any way except for the name change

(bin files are generated by packaging; and backward compatible symlinks will be also provided)

actionless avatar Mar 15 '18 00:03 actionless

Le 15/03/2018 à 01:54, Yauhen Kirylau a écrit :

repository structure won't be affected, only packaging scripts, so if you are writing your own packaging scripts this change shouldn't affect you in any way except for the name change

Right, but if you change the source name, Ill have to change the source package name and all package name and provide transitional package. It's not a big issue for downstream repository but I would prefer to have a proper package directly if push it to the official Debian repository to avoid transitional package. I mean transitional package the name package oomox will depends on the new name, oomox-cli will also depend on the new name etc. We couldn't drop package from the repository if people have installed with the previous name. We'll also change path and so provide symbolic links to keep things working for script. So IMO it's easier to push directly the right package with the right package name.

Best regards, Alex.

alexarnaud avatar Mar 15 '18 09:03 alexarnaud

yup, in that case it could be reasonable to wait for the name change

actionless avatar Mar 15 '18 11:03 actionless

@AladW sorry for spamming you from here but mb you have some recommendation regarding packaging layout for Arch? ie the way how app will be splitted into the packages and if it should have a common group for them (see first message for the description)

actionless avatar Mar 26 '18 23:03 actionless

Having 10 PKGBUILDs on AUR with different sources is probably annoying unless you go with unsupported means of installation (i.e. AUR helpers).

I'm not familiar with the build system you use here so don't know what should be split and where; but for a single PKGBUILD, I'd consider a git submodule approach both for git and release version. (cf. https://git.archlinux.org/svntogit/community.git/tree/trunk/PKGBUILD?h=packages/pacutils)

AladW avatar Mar 27 '18 00:03 AladW

so you think it's fine to leave it as is? https://github.com/actionless/oomox/blob/master/packaging/arch/PKGBUILD#L14-L22

actionless avatar Mar 27 '18 01:03 actionless

At the same time splitted packaging will help to remove dependency on Inkscape (which is needed only for Materia theme plugin).

actionless avatar Mar 27 '18 02:03 actionless

@smurphos going to tag 1.6.1 quite soon (before end of the month) before next planned release (1.7.0) i gonna move all the repos to the new organization

name will be changed for 1.8.0 or 2.0 (whichever of them will be next version after)

actionless avatar Mar 27 '18 16:03 actionless

ok, release is done, this weekend, i guess, i'll start movnig the repos

actionless avatar Mar 30 '18 15:03 actionless

done moving the repos

actionless avatar Mar 31 '18 19:03 actionless

@nana-4 i was also thinking for themix 2.0 line, to preserve the legacy of the old oomox name (without changing app icon too much to became not recognizable in compare to previous), to vectorize this into a new icon (bitmap looks not fine on lower sizes):

oomox_2_0_4_16 oomox_2_0_4_24 oomox_2_0_4_48 oomox_2_0_4_64 oomox_2_0_4_128 oomox_2_0_4_256

oomox_2_0_4

UPD: i've got some feedback what it looking sorta like a scull so i've also came up with an alternative design:

oomox_2_0_4_kid_friendly

actionless avatar Jan 09 '19 04:01 actionless

Is that the monkey face? Or human? Why someone's face for Themix app icon?

I’m sorry to say, but IMHO it looks a bit too scary face as an icon...

P.S. I was going to update the icon design according to the GNOME's initiative before the release of GNOME 3.32. (Yeah, I have to admit that the current icon design is obviously biased toward Material Design.)

nana-4 avatar Jan 09 '19 23:01 nana-4

that's an alien, which is related to word 'oomox'

i thought what having a mascot would add more humanity to the project, and also give some additional identity and recognition to the app icon/logo (because current one, when observing the menu, looking quite similar to "Appearance Settings" icon in some of the icon themes)

also i think you should have some skills to re-draw it in a more kawaii way :3 mb just in a simple chibi style drawing (here's screenshot from the original tv show just for the reference: 2019-01-09--1547054339_619x432_scrot )

actionless avatar Jan 09 '19 23:01 actionless

My impression of the idea of mascot:

  • Looking at the Wikipedia of List of computing mascots, languages/platforms/services/OSs tend to have a mascot. They are abstract and tend to have a large community.
  • Some specific tools/apps (e.g. GIMP, Pidgin, eMule) have mascots and they are used for icons directly, but I think that trend is obsolete in modern times.
  • So I think having a mascot for "Themix Project" might be good, but I'm not a big fan of using him/her for Themix app icon itself.
  • Copying the design based on the existing TV character may be a copyright infringement. (Though I'm not so sure because I'm not a law expert.)
  • Also I'm not too confident I can re-draw him in a more kawaii way :disappointed_relieved:

nana-4 avatar Jan 10 '19 11:01 nana-4

regarding copyright concern i think it falls under fair usage in parody context, though you could mb came with a more abstract alien, less similar to the original reference but still having some far resemblance

actionless avatar Jan 10 '19 12:01 actionless

also i've went through the list on wikipedia and actually Mozilla was using a creature from Godzilla movie as their mascot, i think it's exactly the same case as here

also i found a chibi drawing of ferengi for your inspiration:

451d66403f9349440e740c6cd8934315--geek-gear-my-mom

and one more not chibi but also cute, in some way, i guess:

c1r3

not so much related as previous two, but still: https://scontent-atl3-1.cdninstagram.com/vp/6ac6d75243642e4bd2daf0390a02d8ff/5CD9E668/t51.2885-15/e35/47063713_120894235614951_2999579947800439334_n.jpg?_nc_ht=scontent-atl3-1.cdninstagram.com

actionless avatar Jan 10 '19 14:01 actionless

also it just came up to me what mascot's name could be Themengi

UPD: or less connected to franchise: "Theming Alien" or so

actionless avatar Jan 10 '19 18:01 actionless

So, what about something like this? This is a silhouette only design inspired by Xue, the mascot of Xfce.

image

NOTE: This is a pre-alpha version. I share this just to know what you think of such a design.

nana-4 avatar Jan 11 '19 12:01 nana-4

yeah! the shape is already looking attractive

actionless avatar Jan 11 '19 12:01 actionless

I'm considering packing this for Void Linux again, but the package is quite large and I would have preferred the package be split into sub-packages on a 'as needed' basis.

A CLI would be pretty neat too, to export some base16 stuff.

Do you still have interest in the restructure?

b1scu1t avatar Feb 18 '20 13:02 b1scu1t

yeah, after adding new icon themes the whole package is indeed very huge, so that would make sense

regarding CLI there is already a separate issue: https://github.com/themix-project/oomox/issues/202

actionless avatar Feb 18 '20 18:02 actionless

Since April 2019 I was forced to split icon themes into subpackages for RPM packaging, since the number of files actually seemed to reach a hard limit that RPM packages support. For now what I've done is putting each icon/GTK theme in their own package, which oomox/themix depends on.

LaurentTreguier avatar Feb 19 '20 09:02 LaurentTreguier

i was thinking to package all themes as optional dependencies for AUR package of oomox gui

actionless avatar Feb 19 '20 11:02 actionless

so far i'm thinking to split into the following packages:

Meta:
  • [x] oomox depends on: themix-full

  • [x] themix-full depends on: themix-gui themix-theme-arc themix-theme-oomox themix-theme-materia themix-icons-archdroid themix-icons-gnome-colors themix-icons-numix themix-icons-papirus themix-icons-suruplus themix-icons-suruplus-aspromauros themix-export-spotify themix-plugin-base16 themix-import-image

GUI:
  • [x] themix-gui optional deps: themix-theme-arc themix-theme-oomox themix-theme-materia themix-icons-archdroid themix-icons-gnome-colors themix-icons-numix themix-icons-papirus themix-icons-suruplus themix-icons-suruplus-aspromauros themix-export-spotify themix-plugin-base16 themix-import-image
Themes:
  • [x] themix-theme-arc
  • [x] themix-theme-oomox
  • [x] themix-theme-materia
Icons:
  • [x] themix-icons-archdroid
  • [x] themix-icons-gnome-colors
  • [x] themix-icons-numix
  • [x] themix-icons-papirus
  • [x] themix-icons-suru-plus
  • [x] themix-icons-suru-plus-aspromauros
Import/Export:
  • [x] themix-export-spotify

  • [x] themix-plugin-base16 depends on: themix-gui

  • [x] themix-import-images depends on: themix-gui

actionless avatar Feb 19 '20 14:02 actionless

Looks good to me, I would assume that the theme plugin would be bundled with said theme package?

And the GUI would have to be modular?

b1scu1t avatar Mar 08 '20 23:03 b1scu1t

yup

actionless avatar Mar 09 '20 10:03 actionless

Testing the split packages in the AUR; themix-gui-git,themix-icons-gnome-colors-git & themix-theme-oomox-git seems to work well thus far. The GUI notifies if its missing an icon or gtk theme, that's cool.

b1scu1t avatar Mar 17 '20 12:03 b1scu1t

thanks for the feedback! i hope to finish up all the packages during this week

actionless avatar Mar 17 '20 12:03 actionless

finally managed with it, still remains some renaming of the files and so on

actionless avatar Mar 17 '20 22:03 actionless