Artur Zagretdinov

@xian and @raphw could you help me to clarify the issue and current state with https://github.com/robolectric/robolectric/pull/2761 PowerMock uses the following code to load `InlineByteBuddyMockMaker`. ``` ClassLoader loader = Thread.currentThread().getContextClassLoader(); if...

@raphw, As I see in stacktrace it was OpenJDK >Java : 1.8 JVM vendor name : JetBrains s.r.o JVM vendor version : 25.112-b736 JVM name : OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM...

@mepeisen, thanks for raising the problem. We ware going to look to jUnit5 and implementing supporting of jUnit5 after we finish preparing current release. And maybe it could be to...

Good example, how we can avoid over controlling - TestNG `ObjectFactory`. This class has a method to create a new instance of class. PowerMock create a new instance, which is...

@johanhaleby what do think?

@mepeisen, I don't know how it could be done in jUnit5. I spoke about jUnit4 (where when we use runner we have to control test execution or if use Rule...

@jlink, I think, that suggested approach with be sufficient for PowerMock, in case if there will be a way to reloaded test Instance via PowerMock class loader, for example by...

I think, ideally, it will be awesome if PowerMock could register anyhow global class loader (or class loader factory, which will be better, because PowerMock will still be able control...

@jlink, I also understand your doubts about giving such Powerful option which could breaks all in case improper using. But what do you think to allowed register class loader or...

@mepeisen, PowerMock have to control all pointed stages: - Creating the test instance - Running the test - Running all extension points to avoid class of problems which PowerMock has...