theeldermillenial

Maybe related to #330

@nielstron I am reasonably certain our issues are related. From your example, I plugged this into the CBOR playground. [Original CBOR](https://cbor.nemo157.com/#type=hex&value=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) [Restored CBOR](https://cbor.nemo157.com/#type=hex&value=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) In the original CBOR, there is a...

Ugh, you did. I missed that comment 😅 Well, I'm going to track it down and send a PR shortly. I need this for cancelling dex transactions. I'll make sure...

So...this ended up being significantly more complex than I realized. I thought worst case scenario was to create a custom decoder analogous to the custom encoder. It turns out that...

That was a very delayed response hahaha. I saw the PR, and I'm excited to try this out now with the new wrapped functions. The IDEs I use make extensive...

@T-recks I do have an open PR on this, but it's currently held up by it causing a divergence from the C extension. https://github.com/agronholm/cbor2/pull/225 I have not had a chance...

Hey, I authored #227 I like your idea. I don't see a need to have a complete feature parity C-extension. Ideally the C-extension only implements the things that benefit compiled...

@agronholm sorry for tagging you but I couldn't assign you as a reviewer.

Hey @agronholm Just wanted to bump this to make sure it doesn't fly under the radar.

@agronholm could you please take a look at this?