Stargirl Flowers

That's okay! Thanks for letting me know. On Mon, Mar 8, 2021, 3:15 AM Andrea Cimatoribus wrote: > Unlikely that I find the time any time soon, sorry. > >...

@dhermes do you still think this is relevant?

The blocker on this issue is figuring out exactly how this would work and how we would invoke it using `-s` and `-k`.

I would *love* this feature. Especially for projects that need to do integration tests where they start a webserver and then run tests against it, this would be amazing. A...

`session.background` would fork() then execv() On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 3:22 PM Marc Brooks wrote: > I was going to take a stab at this, since it's a need...

or even just subprocess.Popen() and keep track of the process handle. On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 3:34 PM Thea Flowers wrote: > `session.background` would fork() then execv() > >...

(1) yes. (2) maybe, but don't twist that function too much to make it work for this case. On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 3:47 PM Marc Brooks wrote: >...

At first glance this seems awesome, and the presence of this standard would make Nox's Python discovery mechanism a lot more reliable and deterministic. I'll let the other maintainers take...

@pszynk brought up that Nox's behavior with pyenv may not be correct: > Only local python interpreter versions should be considered when using pyenv local. > If we add python...

I'm not sure I really understand how this is an issue? Nox looks at the path to discover pythons on unixes, and if it's on the path it's fair game....