Stephan Seitz

so this should be fine enough to merge

@MunifTanjim there are workflows like this which let you test whether specific files changed similar to Gitlabs if changed option https://github.com/tj-actions/changed-files and ... I forgot about `install.lua`. That should also...

We had this idea earlier and we wanted to actually align the lockfile updates with our activity. Until now it only does a git request (not even checkout) which is...

In the ABI request, you'd test what users have and see whether they'd experience breakages. After that PR, we can upgrade. Neovim could be done even now.

@clason @dundargoc Actions can trigger other actions, however actions performed by a git user not associated to a Github account get ignored as trigger for actions. This is why you...

For me it has the `TSMacro` highlight (apart from the brackets) which is ok for me. It could also use the C++ `@attribute` like C++ attributes or Python annotations. Not...

Me too. You can create a a query in our personal `:TSEditQuery highlight` on a rust file. Use `@attribute` and `(#set priority 101)` to overwrite all other highlights. Maybe it...

I think it would be best to stay with the current highlights but make the captures more specialized as @adrian5 requested. We could use `@function.macro.attribute-item` instead of `@function.macro` which would...

First attempts with the suggestion made before with highlighting `"!" "[" "]" (indentifier)` special in attribute_item's  by highlighting `attribute_item` as a whole with higher priority  Both don't solve...

What we need for that is the possibility to strip away leading `///` to provide normal code to the rust parser for injection. @steelsojka