Taine Zhao

@lfkdsk Oh, yes... This does need a better design...

Hi, could you remove this as well: https://github.com/thautwarm/moshmosh/blob/65691b332a46ac04088c82b4ca7660dc7102ac3a/moshmosh/extensions/pattern_matching/core.py#L284 If `is` stuffs get removed they're then useless at all. Besides, I tried to speed up the program safely with some compile...

As we're implementing compilers, It's a valid behaviour. Also, it's compatible for almost all python implementations(many treat `is` as a structural equality operator for immutable data)

> If it is a way to speed up the program, how about disable the warning or tell the user to disable it? I'm working on this, and will remove...

First, purescript compiler is already able to transform tail call into loops. However, it does not work for deeply stacked do-notations. I'm not sure if [purescript-tailrec](https://pursuit.purescript.org/packages/purescript-tailrec/4.1.1) helps, but if you...

Could you provide an MWE for this? I cannot reproduce that issue, so the problem still remained. https://github.com/purescript/spago/issues/643

once your finished, please ping me. we can pass the ci and build releases from it.

Thanks for your interest! For example, to support `purescript-enum`, we write a git(it can be bitbucket/gitlab hosted one) project: [purescript-enums.py](https://github.com/purescript-python/purescript-enums.py) Check its project structure and the correspondence between it(the FFI...

Besides, so far it seems that you cannot implement purescript-quickcheck because it seems quickcheck used the internal representation of chars and strings. We now map purescript strings to python strings,...

@mikesol we now working on purescript-quickcheck