textbrowser
textbrowser
sqlite> select length(keyword) from book; 575250000 Functional adaptation: "SUBSTR(keyword, 1, 2048) AS keyword".
Do you think software in the open and proprietary world protects against this? Most likely not.
With thousands and thousands of queries, yikes. Queries and sub-queries (WHERE keyword IN (...)), yikes again.
Diagnostic tools die too.
That is why this is a ticket for an expert and diligent person. It'll serve as a warning to future people. :)
No. > cat /dev/urandom | od -h > output Copy some text. Then use sqlite3 tool to update a table entry. Open BQ, open the database, open the particular book...
GIT dies too if you attempt to compare the database files.
Your SQLite file can be easily replaced.
You have to monitor its size, its permissions, its dates.
You mean a digest / fingerprint? That's possible with SQLite. Kind of nearly impossible with PQ.