testcontainers
Add SQLite package
Problem
Lack to support SQLite database OOB
Solution
Introducing Testcontainers.Sqlite package
Benefit
Allow devs to use SQLite
Alternatives
Nothing
Would you like to help contributing this enhancement?
Yes
Could you please elaborate on what are the advantages of using a Docker container over directly using one of the many available SQLite libraries such as Microsoft.Data.Sqlite, SQLite-net or System.Data.SQLite?
I working on an OSS project I just find myself need a docker image for integration testing. I know I can manage it myself by creating a .db but I need to cleanup everything after the testing
Couldn't you use the generic container builder? We could add a section to our documentation covering common builder patterns, similar to an article or how-to guide. I am uncertain whether we require modules for all kinds of "simple" configurations.
Is there even a container image available? How would you access the database from remote? Looking forward to discussing this topic and hear your thoughts (since I would simply store the database in-memory and might miss something).
Is there even a container image available?
https://hub.docker.com/r/keinos/sqlite3#!
(since I would simply store the database in-memory and might miss something).
This sometimes problematic especially in testing
https://hub.docker.com/r/keinos/sqlite3#!
As I commented here, I do not think it hosts a database accessible remotely. According to the Docker Hub docs, they also mount the database file from the host. I am not sure how you are planning to implement a module, but I am curious to see the proof of concept.
I will close this issue. As mentioned, I do not think the image is a hosted SQLite instance. If you have any further information, do not hesitate to reopen the issue.