tersec
tersec
> Dunno man. I'd personally take a 99.99% solution than no solution, or having to install a library for the 0.01% use case that I'll never need. This is a...
> But it really is not used as you don't instantiate the generic. Exactly. And yet there's no `XDeclaredButNotUsed` hint.
> The issue is marking the symbol of the proc itself used in general, this also doesn't give an unused warning: > > ```nim > proc foo() = > foo()...
> Confirmed that #20829 causes it locally. However it should be known that this always errored when using `int64` on a 64 bit machine and #20829 likely made it consistent...
Yeah, this probably never should have compiled.
This PR now shows no changes left -- does it/should it still being doing something?
A general point is that within the weak subjectivity period, a node can trust its own state not to be mislead by arbitrary hostile/malicious input, but if there's an automated...
Succeeded by https://github.com/status-im/nimbus-eth2/pull/6322
Been overtaken by events.
Yes, it's a gcc 14 incompatibility. https://github.com/status-im/nim-stint/pull/153 resolves the `nim-stint` issue in isolation, but it's not the only part of this. We're working on resolving this.