add: cbmem

[Owen-sz]

[Owen-sz]

I guess it fails on rawhide on CI. Works fine on 41 locally, but getting a GPG issue when I try to build off rawhide locally, guessing that's due to the branch off.

[GildedRoach]

I guess it fails on rawhide on CI. Works fine on 41 locally, but getting a GPG issue when I try to build off rawhide locally, guessing that's due to the branch off.

Have you updated the Mock configs?

The failures here may be the standard bump in GCC, you can try telling the compiler to ignore the particular errors or to use the old standard (gnu17 for C or gnu++17 for C++).

[Owen-sz]

I guess it fails on rawhide on CI. Works fine on 41 locally, but getting a GPG issue when I try to build off rawhide locally, guessing that's due to the branch off.

Have you updated the Mock configs?

The failures here may be the standard bump in GCC, you can try telling the compiler to ignore the particular errors or to use the old standard (gnu17 for C or gnu++17 for C++).

I'd rather not use an older version/ignore it as to not break stuff.

What do you mean by updating the mock config though? Not sure how to do that.

[GildedRoach]

I guess it fails on rawhide on CI. Works fine on 41 locally, but getting a GPG issue when I try to build off rawhide locally, guessing that's due to the branch off.

Have you updated the Mock configs? The failures here may be the standard bump in GCC, you can try telling the compiler to ignore the particular errors or to use the old standard (gnu17 for C or gnu++17 for C++).

I'd rather not use an older version/ignore it as to not break stuff.

What do you mean by updating the mock config though? Not sure how to do that.

Oh I mean the terra-mock-configs package on your system.

Also the older standard is generally fine, GCC 15 (which Rawhide uses) hasn't rolled out most places yet so most stuff is still using the 17 standard by default. GCC itself also is untouched, it's just a flag telling it to use a specific standard, a lot of projects pass specific flags like that so it depends on the situation (for example, some projects pass the flag -std=c99 which is the 99 standard for C).

[Owen-sz]

Added all coreboot licenses, should be all added correctly.

[Owen-sz]

Yay it worked

[raboneko]

💚 All backports created successfully

Status	Branch	Result
✅	f41
✅	el10
✅	f42

Questions ?

Please refer to the Backport tool documentation and see the Github Action logs for details