terraform-aws-acm icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
terraform-aws-acm copied to clipboard

Allow specifying an alternative provider for dns records

Open njoerd114 opened this issue 2 years ago β€’ 7 comments

Is your request related to a new offering from AWS?

  • Yes βœ…: please list the AWS provider version which introduced this functionality

Is your request related to a problem? Please describe.

We're managing our DNS Zones in a separate AWS Account. We'd like to use this module to provision ACM Certificates for products in their accounts.

Describe the solution you'd like.

Add the option to specify an additional provider (defaults to the default provider).

Describe alternatives you've considered.

One could also specify the validation records separately and not use this functionality from the module, however that would result in some overhead.

Additional context

Module Provider Docs

njoerd114 avatar Jun 02 '22 09:06 njoerd114

#108 actually seams to achieve this...

njoerd114 avatar Jun 02 '22 09:06 njoerd114

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has been open 30 days with no activity. Remove stale label or comment or this issue will be closed in 10 days

github-actions[bot] avatar Jul 03 '22 00:07 github-actions[bot]

#108 actually seams to achieve this...

I've been using the forked repo I created for the above in a number of project and it works without issue. Sadly it's been two months and I've still not heard anything from the module Code owners. :'(

dannyibishev avatar Jul 08 '22 15:07 dannyibishev

+1

MrKoopaKiller avatar Aug 01 '22 08:08 MrKoopaKiller

@njoerd114 I understand your use case, but I do not think it is the responsibility of a Terraform module to support different AWS accounts.

For example, the subdomain in account A could point to the nameservers of account B's hosted zone.

Another possibility would be to use Terragrunt or Terramate.

dhoppe avatar Aug 17 '22 10:08 dhoppe

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has been open 30 days with no activity. Remove stale label or comment or this issue will be closed in 10 days

github-actions[bot] avatar Sep 17 '22 00:09 github-actions[bot]

#114 Closes this issue. Thanks Anton πŸ₯‡

dannyibishev avatar Sep 20 '22 06:09 dannyibishev

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has been open 30 days with no activity. Remove stale label or comment or this issue will be closed in 10 days

github-actions[bot] avatar Oct 21 '22 00:10 github-actions[bot]

I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues. If you have found a problem that seems similar to this, please open a new issue and complete the issue template so we can capture all the details necessary to investigate further.

github-actions[bot] avatar Nov 28 '22 02:11 github-actions[bot]