Jean-Yves Perrier

I apply @caugner proposal, which is better: - only_dedicated_and_window - only_dedicated - except_service - except_service_and_window - only_service_and_window - only_service It isn't compatible with the current parameter (`notservice`), but this can...

What about the following? (The commit [c1232e5](https://github.com/mdn/yari/pull/10029/commits/c1232e54191bd537822562d31c29a01e28c9ee09) implements it): From: // 'only_dedicated_and_window': only in DedicatedWorker (and in Window) // 'only_dedicated': only in DedicatedWorker // 'except_service': all workers but ServiceWorker (and...

> More is not always better. Yes, and if more is needed, we can always open a PR and have a discussion about the pertinence of it. I also like...

Can we have a review on this? @Claas or @LeoMcA ? #8372 proved valuable in keeping the number of flaws at bay. A few refactoring (like CSS) are ahead of...

Is this ready for re-review? Asking because the live sample is not working: https://pr31713.content.dev.mdn.mozit.cloud/en-US/docs/Web/API/HTMLMapElement/areas Anything I can do to help?

(Sorry I didn't mean to approve this one – Just ignore me)

Leaving it open to allow @hamishwillee to do his rereview.

What about adding **two** spec URL links: - one to https://webidl.spec.whatwg.org/#idl-iterable where `iterable` (and similarly `maplike`, `setlike`, …) is defined - one to the position in the relevant spec where...

Sorry, I missed this one. We want to retire this repository, so we prefer not to add non-data features. If you are using it and need help getting rid of...

Will's points are essential. We are closing this but in favor of the discussion in https://github.com/orgs/mdn/discussions/442