Instant view does not cycle through images when present
Steps to reproduce
- Open instant view link that contains multiple images
- press left or right to cycle to the next image
Expected behaviour
The instant view cycles to the next image in the album on a supported link
Actual behaviour
It only loads the current image and does not allow you to cycle to new images
Operating system
Windows 10
Version of Telegram Desktop
4.15.4 Beta
Installation source
Static binary from official website
Crash ID
No response
Logs
No response
can you test on android / ios?
Unable to test iOS
But android creates an album with all the images from a link, whereas desktop sets all images to single photo
Can you provide a link with IV to test that?
This one should show the interaction. Uncertain what's meant with IV (edit, just noticed IV stands for instant view)
https://fxtwitter.com/Wario64/status/1765878767287730379
- Open instant view link that contains multiple images
- Open image
- Press left or right to cycle to the next image
Hey there!
This issue was inactive for a long time and will be automatically closed in 30 days if there isn't any further activity. We therefore assume that the user has lost interest or resolved the problem on their own.
Don't worry though; if this is an error, let us know with a comment and we'll be happy to reopen the issue.
Thanks!
Still relevant
Hey there!
This issue was inactive for a long time and will be automatically closed in 30 days if there isn't any further activity. We therefore assume that the user has lost interest or resolved the problem on their own.
Don't worry though; if this is an error, let us know with a comment and we'll be happy to reopen the issue.
Thanks!
Still relevant
Hey there!
This issue was inactive for a long time and will be automatically closed in 30 days if there isn't any further activity. We therefore assume that the user has lost interest or resolved the problem on their own.
Don't worry though; if this is an error, let us know with a comment and we'll be happy to reopen the issue.
Thanks!
Still relevant