Phil Hagelberg

I agree that this sucks, but the default paredit bindings suck more. I'd be happy to change it to something less likely to conflict if we ever do a breaking...

Yeah, most of these language-specific modules are in need of a maintainer. Only the lisp one is up-to-date.

Hm; I tried this and it turns C-c x into a no-op. This is on 24 from around the time of the first pretest.

I'd like to see something like this land as a module for v2 of the starter kit if someone can handle ongoing maintainership. https://github.com/technomancy/emacs-starter-kit/tree/v2/modules

I am actually not really in a good position to continue maintaining the ruby portion of the starter kit. It would be great if someone else who still uses ruby...

Have you tried building from master? I believe this is fixed in 8ac000e8c26e390.

> I don't have experience with OCaml, so I'm not sure if I did all the > preparations correctly. Should I try to build it under another OS > maybe?...

This is blocked on the release of ctypes 0.2.

Yes, definitely a bug in the operator special; you can replace `let` with `do` and it still triggers. But it won't trigger without the `not`. Thanks for finding this; good...

The bug is in this function: https://git.sr.ht/~technomancy/fennel/tree/1.1.0/item/src/fennel/specials.fnl#L773 It has a list of "dangerous" specials, but honestly as you've demonstrated here even a "pure" special like `not` can contain "dangerous" side-effects....